<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IEEPA duties &#8211; Sharretts, Paley, Carter &amp; Blauvelt, P.C.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://spcblaw.com/tag/ieepa-duties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://spcblaw.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 19:02:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>CBP Expands CAPE to Entries Flagged for Reconciliation</title>
		<link>https://spcblaw.com/2026/06/24/cbp-expands-cape-reconciliation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geraldine Tourny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 18:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Client Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPE declaration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPE refund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customs tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEPA duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEPA refunds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEPA tariffs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spcblaw.com/?p=4118</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[U.S. Customs and Border Protection has announced that effective June 29, 2026, CAPE will accept entries flagged for reconciliation (entry types 01, 02, and 06) for which the related reconciliation entry (entry type 09) has not yet been filed. CBP confirmed that all filing and processing requirements from the first phase of CAPE remain in...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify">U.S. Customs and Border Protection has <a href="https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCBP/bulletins/41d65dd" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced</a> that effective June 29, 2026, CAPE will accept entries flagged for reconciliation (entry types 01, 02, and 06) for which the related reconciliation entry (entry type 09) has not yet been filed.</p>
<p align="justify">CBP confirmed that all filing and processing requirements from the first phase of CAPE remain in effect; notably, acceptance remains limited to unliquidated entries and entries within 80 days of liquidation.</p>
<p align="justify">Once an entry flagged for reconciliation is accepted on a CAPE declaration, the corresponding reconciliation entry may then be filed.</p>
<p align="justify">However, CBP cautioned that if the reconciliation filing deadline is approaching (e.g. where fewer than 30 days remain), priority should be given to filing the reconciliation entry to avoid missing the deadline.</p>
<p align="justify">CBP also noted that while entries flagged for reconciliation for which a reconciliation entry is already on file are not yet covered by this functionality, those entries are expected to be addressed in a future phase of CAPE development.</p>
<p align="justify">Please <a href="https://spcblaw.com/about-us/contact/">contact us</a> with any additional questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBP Provides Additional Details on Upcoming CAPE Phases</title>
		<link>https://spcblaw.com/2026/06/10/cbp-upcoming-cape-phases/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geraldine Tourny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Client Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPE Phase 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPE Phase 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customs law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duty refunds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEPA duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEPA refunds]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spcblaw.com/?p=4110</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[During yesterday&#8217;s hearing before the U.S. Court of International Trade, representatives from U.S. Customs and Border Protection provided additional details regarding the upcoming phases of the CAPE refund process. Specifically, CBP indicated that Phase 2, which will cover reconciliation entries, is expected to launch on June 29, 2026. CBP further stated that Phase 3, which...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify">During yesterday&#8217;s hearing before the U.S. Court of International Trade, representatives from U.S. Customs and Border Protection provided additional details regarding the upcoming phases of the CAPE refund process.</p>
<p align="justify">Specifically, CBP indicated that Phase 2, which will cover reconciliation entries, is expected to launch on June 29, 2026. CBP further stated that Phase 3, which is intended to cover all finally liquidated entries subject to IEEPA tariffs, is expected to launch at the end of July 2026.</p>
<p align="justify">At the same time, CBP reiterated its opposition to a universal refund mechanism, arguing that Phase 3 should be limited to importers that have filed suit at the CIT. We therefore expect continued litigation regarding whether refunds will ultimately be available to all affected importers or only to those participating in the litigation.</p>
<p align="justify">Given this uncertainty, companies with outstanding IEEPA duty refunds that have not yet instructed us to file a pleading before the CIT should <a href="https://spcblaw.com/about-us/contact/">contact us</a> immediately to do so.</p>
<p align="justify">For further information, please contact Gail Cumins at <a href="mailto:gcumins@spcblaw.com" target="_blank">gcumins@spcblaw.com</a>, Alli Baron at <a href="mailto:abaron@spcblaw.com" target="_blank">abaron@spcblaw.com</a> or call us at 212-425-0055.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government Announces Intent to Appeal CIT Order on IEEPA Duty Refunds</title>
		<link>https://spcblaw.com/2026/05/31/appeal-ieepa-refund-order/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geraldine Tourny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 19:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Client Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of International Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customs tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEPA duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEPA litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEPA refunds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEPA tariffs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spcblaw.com/?p=4101</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Government has now formally announced its intention to appeal the U.S. Court of International Trade’s order requiring refunds of IEEPA duties on finally liquidated entries. Specifically, the Government intends to challenge the Court’s authority to order refunds for importers that are not parties to the litigation and whose entries have become final. Accordingly, companies...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify">The Government has now formally announced its intention to appeal the U.S. Court of International Trade’s order requiring refunds of IEEPA duties on finally liquidated entries. Specifically, the Government <a href="https://insidetrade.com/daily-news/trump-administration-will-appeal-universal-tariff-refund-order" target="_blank" rel="noopener">intends</a> to challenge the Court’s authority to order refunds for importers that are not parties to the litigation and whose entries have become final.</p>
<p align="justify">Accordingly, companies that have not yet joined the litigation, but have potential refunds associated with entries that liquidated more than 90 days ago, should consider filing their own protective pleading with the CIT as soon as possible.</p>
<p align="justify">In this regard, given the Government’s position, it is increasingly likely that a company-specific court order will be required to recover refunds on finally liquidated entries.</p>
<p align="justify">Please <a href="https://spcblaw.com/2026/05/08/section-122-tariffs-unlawful/#:~:text=Follow%20us%3A-,CONTACT%20US,-Home">contact us</a> if you are interested in filing. We will continue to keep you apprised of further developments.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CIT Raises Possibility of Broader IEEPA Duty Refunds on Entries Ineligible for CAPE Phase 1</title>
		<link>https://spcblaw.com/2026/05/28/cit-broader-ieepa-duty-refunds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geraldine Tourny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 18:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Client Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customs duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customs refunds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customs tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEPA duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEPA litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEPA refunds]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spcblaw.com/?p=4099</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This week, during a closed-door hearing at the Court of International Trade (CIT), Judge Eaton questioned why no progress has been made on refunding IEEPA tariffs paid in connection with entries beyond the “deemed liquidated” status stage. The Court requested that Customs submit a brief explaining why it should not be required to refund all IEEPA...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify">This week, during a closed-door hearing at the Court of International Trade (CIT), Judge Eaton questioned why no progress has been made on refunding IEEPA tariffs paid in connection with entries beyond the “deemed liquidated” status stage. The Court requested that Customs submit a brief explaining why it should not be required to refund all IEEPA duties collected on all entries, regardless of liquidation status or date of liquidation.</p>
<p align="justify">The Court, unusually, has also <a href="https://www.law360.com/tax-authority/articles/2482275/court-orders-cbp-commish-to-testify-in-tariff-refund-suit" target="_blank" rel="noopener">instructed</a> Rodney S. Scott, Commissioner of Customs, to appear in person on June 9, 2026, to discuss the agency&#8217;s plans to comply with the Court&#8217;s order to reliquidate all applicable entries without IEEPA duties.</p>
<p align="justify">Customs has also been instructed to submit an updated CAPE progress report by June 10, 2026.</p>
<p align="justify">Collectively, these developments suggest that the CIT is considering the possibility of ordering the broad refund of all IEEPA duties, including those associated with entries presently excluded from CAPE phase 1.</p>
<p align="justify">However, it is also possible the government will respond to these instructions by filing an appeal to the CIT’s original refund order. Any appeal would need to be filed by June 6, 2026.</p>
<p align="justify">With so many questions remaining, it is imperative that you continue to take the necessary steps to protect your company’s IEEPA refunds.</p>
<p align="justify">Please <a href="https://spcblaw.com/about-us/contact/">contact us</a> to discuss the best course of action for your company at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
